On Friday 20 October 2006 12:59, Warren Togami wrote: > Existing trusted users (who are quite numerous and membership expands at > a good rate) would have free reign without bureaucratic overhead to > create projects and repositories. They could grant commit access to > others, and be responsible for content in repositories that they own. > > I see this as a good balance that both allows flexibility of developers > to do what they want, with an effective amount of risk mitigation. Absolutely. I don't discount that at all. (although we can't allow them to call it a 'Fedora' project until it goes through the approval method for that...) However I just want to make aware that for an outside person who wants to start a project for Fedora may have to jump through the hoops of becoming a 'trusted user'. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpXrrIiAo82T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
