On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:20 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > I won't say use 108 b/c: > 1. 108 is not open source s/108/SourceForge/ And unlike SF, the people behind 108 (me, Red Hat, etc.) are in favor of a 100% FLOSS solution. We just couldn't find one for the time-to-market. Also nice to have a managed hosting provider, with that same time-to-market. At the rate that Fedora is progressing with this, 108 could get there first. :) > 2. 108 is not a fedora project at all s/108/SourceForge/ s/108/Google hosting/ ... > 3. 108 requires YET ANOTHER ACCOUNT. s/108/SourceForge/ Not if you already have a redhat.com account, which many people either have already or will want. -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
