On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:12 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Friday 20 October 2006 10:02, Mike McGrath wrote: > > So people have been asking more and more for general VCS space, > > sometimes SVN, GIT, CVS. My question for the board: Is the Fedora > > Project a place to host this stuff or should we just point them to > > freshmeat and sourceforge? Here's an example thats comes up: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/tickets/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&Tic > >ketID=102 > > > > and another > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/tickets/customer.pl?Action=CustomerTicketZo > >om&TicketID=94 > > > > At present there is no formal policy (that I am aware of). > > So some will say use 108, but others will say that 108 doesn't support the SCM > of their choice. There are some projects, things that are written > specifically for Fedora and Fedora based distributions (like RHEL) that may > want to develop out in the public space, with the SCM of their choice. > Sending those people to sourceforge is not a very good solution, as I > wouldn't wish sourceforge on anybody's project. I suppose if we want the > Fedora project to foster software development, and become that 'open source > lab' that I keep hearing about, we probably should try to provide some > infrastructure for these projects. However it is a pretty big undertaking to > try and provide something complete, repo, mailing list, webspace, bug > tracking system, etc.. in such a way that we can easily add and segregate > projects. > I won't say use 108 b/c: 1. 108 is not open source 2. 108 is not a fedora project at all 3. 108 requires YET ANOTHER ACCOUNT. just my thoughts. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
