On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:26 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:23 -0400, Christopher Blizzard wrote: > > > I don't think it's as tough as that. For example, we should really have > > a git repo that fedora developers (including red hat folks!) can use. > > If nothing else, being able to interact with the kernel, x.org and a > > host of other projects is enough reason alone to just host that one thing. > > > > And I think that we don't have to worry about the whole big picture > > here. We're not trying to compete with sourceforge, nor should we try. > > But we should be facilitating individuals to get shit done. And a > > variety of SCMs do just that. > > > > It also makes it so people have to chase down a bunch of different scm > tools just to be able to work on multiple projects in fedora. > > That's sad-face-making, too. > > Increasing complexity raises barriers to entry just as much as limiting > the complexity overly-much does. > > There's a happy medium in there. One of every one isn't it. > I want to add something here. I think the happy medium might be something like: cvs hg git I'm not sure that svn offers us much over cvs, etc and I'm not sure what bzr offers over hg or git. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
