seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:23 -0400, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
I don't think it's as tough as that. For example, we should really have
a git repo that fedora developers (including red hat folks!) can use.
If nothing else, being able to interact with the kernel, x.org and a
host of other projects is enough reason alone to just host that one thing.
And I think that we don't have to worry about the whole big picture
here. We're not trying to compete with sourceforge, nor should we try.
But we should be facilitating individuals to get shit done. And a
variety of SCMs do just that.
It also makes it so people have to chase down a bunch of different scm
tools just to be able to work on multiple projects in fedora.
That's sad-face-making, too.
Increasing complexity raises barriers to entry just as much as limiting
the complexity overly-much does.
There's a happy medium in there. One of every one isn't it.
Agreed completely. Once again, in concrete terms:
o Do you think that supporting git is important?
o How about TLA? (or whatever it's called these days)
o monotone?
Just three examples of SCMs that are in use today. What would you say
to each of those?
--Chris
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
