seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 12:42 -0400, Christopher Blizzard wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
It is inappropriate if it is not known by the user. If it is a
voluntary agreement between the user and the Fedora Group that the
user knows what is tracked, how the data is anonymized, how the data
is being used, and how it can be turned off then it is something that
people can trust and not in my view of the world inappropriate.
Just curious. Do you feel that we ship without the big cookie warning
turned on by default in firefox as an example of something that's
inappropriate?
If we're using that being disabled to allow us to gather more tracking
information then yes. We're CHOOSING to disable items that would let the
user know we're tracking them.
So that default applies to google, redhat.com and lots of other sites.
It's part of how the web works today.
And once again, tracking implies some kind of nefarious end or big
brother type thing. Once again, I'm just interested in if you're using
it, not what you're doing with it or who you are.
--Chris
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
