Re: Metrics: What we *could* get

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/6/06, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Since we're all in the metrics mood I thought it would be good to get
a list of stats I think we could get, from a technology point of view,
not from a 'we should' view.  Hopefully to get us thinking about what
we can do for FC7.




What I learned in trying to help RH get good metrics on webpages and
marketing schemes was 2 things:

1) Perfect is the enemy of the good.

2) Most people do not know what statistics they want until they see them.

We are not going to get perfect statistics. The biggest problem is
accepting that and figuring out what we can live with during each
release cycle.  We will know that any number we have has a counting
error.. and if we use 2-3 'independant' methods, we can figure out
what that error margin is.

After we collect that data, FAB and the people who pull its strings
will say "can you figure out" something we didnt count.. some of that
we will be able to do and some we wont.

--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux