On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 16:33 -0400, Max Spevack wrote: > On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Christopher Blizzard wrote: > > > Just for the record, I think that having kernel modules outside of the kernel > > package is fine. In fact, I think that as a mechanism for people to access > > software that's too bleeding edge for the mainline kernel, or to use hardware > > they wouldn't normally be able to use, it's great. > > > > Yes, I understand that it might not be the best option (*pound fist* > > everything must be upstream! *pound fist*) but in the interest of enabling > > users and giving people more places to participate, it's great. > > Ok, then I pose this: > > Is there anyone on the 9 person Fedora Board (Rex, Seth, Chris, Jeremy, > Bill, Elliot, Rahul, Matt, Paul) who is *against* allowing the kernel > modules? > > If not, the as a Board we need to be willing to defend the decision, and > also to work with the folks who are going to be opposed to that decision > to help make it more palatable for them. > > That's probably going to fall mostly on guys like Jeremy and Bill. > I'm fine with kernel-modules. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
