On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 15:18 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 10:49 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > > Actually, I think I can fix these things by Tuesday. Stay tuned. > > OK, here's how we can do this: > > 1. Lesstif is approved. It needs to incorporate my fixes (see BZ 203274) > and be rebuilt. Has the package made installable in parallel to OpenMotif? If not, very bad decision > 2. libGLw needs to be approved. I posted a fixed SRPM (see BZ 188974). > It needs to be committed and rebuilt into FE. > 3. lesstif needs to be rebuilt one more time after libGLw is built. > Hooray for circular deps! There is no circular dep. libGLw depends on Motif. libGLw depends on Motif, that's all. > 4. mesa without libGLw needs to be rebuilt in Core. > 5. ddd and xpdf need to be moved to Fedora Extras, Bummer, FC dropping the primary GUI-debugger - MASSIVE REGRESSION. > their BR changed from > openmotif-devel to lesstif-devel. > 6. tetex-xdvi can pass --with-xdvi-x-toolkit=xaw to configure, and no > longer depend on motif. It needs to do this and be rebuilt in Core. > 7. At this point, we can destroy openmotif from orbit (with our newly > repaired ORBITAL LASER). > 8. cernlib, cmucl, geomview, gpsd, grace, Inventor, nedit, and xlockmore + OpenSceneGraph, it depends on Inventor. > (all maintainers CC'd) need to change their BR from openmotif-devel to > lesstif-devel. I tested all of these apps and they work correctly > against lesstif. Are you serious about this? Motif is a GUI-toolkit and you can't have tested all apps's functionality. > 9. fbida is the only one in Fedora Core or Fedora Extras that doesn't > work with lesstif, because it needs an actual implementation for > XmeDropSink() (at a minimum, there may be more). Specifically, it is the > "ida" binary in this package that needs openmotif, so I altered the > fbida package to not create the -ida subpackage anymore: > http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/MOTIF/fbida-2.06-1.src.rpm > It needs to be rebuilt and the fbida-ida package nuked (Note: I didn't > make the new package Obsolete/Provide fbida-ida...) > > See? Less than 10 steps even? :) 11. Me filing "critical/highest priority" PRs, should I notice any functional regression due to moving to lesstif and assigning them to Pertusus and Callaway. PS: To me, this mover is a massive regression and fault. Ralf _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
