On Wednesday 09 August 2006 14:50, Christopher Blizzard wrote: > It seems to me that it's not the fact that patches are getting lost, or > that people aren't uploading it. Part of it is that it requires a human > to filter and maintainers are already overloaded as it is. Why isn't it > that we can't have a system that keeps track of changes, let's anyone > try out a change without a hassle and then the patches that people are > using are filtered automatically to the top of a maintainer's queue? > Something like this would make people wildly more productive, connecting > developers, users and maintainers easily without the tools getting in > the way. > > Yeah, this means stepping outside of the usual bugzilla and rpm > mindsets. But we could be doing so much better. And to be fair, for this particular issue the build failure was on s390(x). I don't think many of our community members has one of these to test with. The solution for FC5 updates was to disable building on the non-shipped arches. Unfortunately we can't do that for rawhide / FC6 right now as those builds feed RHEL and RHEL has to ship on those platforms. <insert argument here> -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgp97LlvWHLcz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
