On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Paul W. Frields wrote: > I think everyone would probably agree that any Creative Commons "NC" is > not free enough (probably "ND" as well), but what about "BY" and/or > "SA"? Are there other licenses that work well for art? Because the logo is a registered trademark, there are *no* open licenses that can apply to it. By definition. Any usage of the Fedora logo must be "explicitly approved" by us. Now, that "explicit approval" process can be as lightweight as we can *possibly* make it -- but *by definition* our cannot be placed into any kind of commons. The painful truth. --g ------------------------------------------------------------- Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors ------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
