On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Greg DeKoenigsberg (gdk@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Anyway, that's the proposal. If you have an objection, please be as > > specific as you can possibly be. We want to take action on this soon. > > How would these terms relate to Diana's and Máirín's gimp/photo stuff? It's > neither schwag, nor website, nor a distribution itself. Does this fall under > 'things approved by Fedora Art'? > > Bill Maybe. Here's the high level thinking: If it involves usage of the logo itself, it must be part of an approval process. It it's just pretty pictures for use with Fedora, it doesn't necessarily have to be part of an approval process. I think it's sensible to split any "Fedora Art" efforts into two basic categories: Fedora Logo and Fedora All-Other-Art. --g ------------------------------------------------------------- Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors ------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
