On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 23:16 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >From spot's list: > > > This license doesn't permit modified redistribution, so this is right > > out. On top of that, Fedora _IS_ patching it, so we're in violation. > > nothing requires aspell-nl explicitly, so moving this to FE makes sense. > > I'm wondering what would make this acceptable in FE. Other packages > (eg. pine) having similar conditions have already been rejected. Yeah. I'll email the upstream author and see if I can convince them to drop the restriction. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
