>From spot's list: > This license doesn't permit modified redistribution, so this is right > out. On top of that, Fedora _IS_ patching it, so we're in violation. > nothing requires aspell-nl explicitly, so moving this to FE makes sense. I'm wondering what would make this acceptable in FE. Other packages (eg. pine) having similar conditions have already been rejected. _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
