Greg DeKoenigsberg schrieb: > On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Rahul wrote: >> on 3) Can we put 75% in numbers? What is the rationale behind having a >> limit on Red Hat or non Red Hat seats? IMO, if its a elected position, >> whoever gets elected should be deemed fit to do the job regardless of >> their affiliation. Is Max Spevack, the Fedora Board lead or he is the >> Fedora lead within Red Hat. If its the former, should it be a elected >> position by Fedora contributors (as defined by rule 4) or within the board? > Personally, I like the idea of splitting the board into two different term > cycles. For example: > > Term A, elections after release of FC(even) > Community 1 > Community 2 > Red Hat 1 > Red Hat 2 > Red Hat 3 > > Term B, elections after release of FC(odd) > Community 3 > Community 4 > Red Hat 4 > Red Hat 5 > > Gurantees continuity -- without math. :) +1 CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
