On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Rahul wrote: > on 3) Can we put 75% in numbers? What is the rationale behind having a > limit on Red Hat or non Red Hat seats? IMO, if its a elected position, > whoever gets elected should be deemed fit to do the job regardless of > their affiliation. Is Max Spevack, the Fedora Board lead or he is the > Fedora lead within Red Hat. If its the former, should it be a elected > position by Fedora contributors (as defined by rule 4) or within the board? Personally, I like the idea of splitting the board into two different term cycles. For example: Term A, elections after release of FC(even) Community 1 Community 2 Red Hat 1 Red Hat 2 Red Hat 3 Term B, elections after release of FC(odd) Community 3 Community 4 Red Hat 4 Red Hat 5 Gurantees continuity -- without math. :) --g ------------------------------------------------------------- Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors ------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
