On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 09:25 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > Let me try to stir up the hornet's nest about this some when I get into > the office... Tip: the group providing services to engineering (QA, trans, content, etc.) is the group that has self-identified, from it's leadership, as being accountable for Fedora infrastructure like this. Red Hat has to put some resources onto this project who are not easily distracted by pressing business needs, as if a successful Fedora was not a business need of Red Hat's. :) If that is the above mentioned group, great! But the 'saying' must be followed by the 'doing', and that is where we are today. All say, no do. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
