On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 16:30 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Rahul (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > >Paul W. Frields (stickster@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > >>2. Translation/Infrastructure in Red Hat was supposed to provide a > > >>gateway or integration with the translation system (i18n.redhat.com) for > > >>docs stuff. This would ease the burden on our community translators to > > >>learn different systems, which is a real PITA for those who are already > > >>giving so much of their time. Again, no word. > > > > > >Meanwhile, in distro land, we've been trying to get i18n.redhat.com > > >retired. Not good to be working at cross-purposes. > > > > Whats the alternative here that replaces i18n.redhat.com? > > Moving it to be based on cvs.fedora and the Fedora accounts system rather > than its own special account system. The point is integration, not where the integration ends up. Or, to be more specific, communication about said integration. To clarify, no one is asking for i18n.r.c to stay. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
