On Monday 10 July 2006 12:33, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > In other words: Maybe it's time for a "Fedora Core Steering Committee" > that operates similar to FESCo? E.g. regular and public IRC meetings > (where things like this RPM sage can be brought up and discussed), > Meeting summaries, discussions on a public list (maybe it needs to be > operate similar to FAB, e.g. invite only and a readonly archive for the > public?) ...? It would be okay for me if only Red Hat people are on the > "Fedora Core Steering Committee" for now until Extras and Core get > closer together, but such a Committee would be start into the right > direction IMHO. > > Just my 2 cent. And yes, I suspect some Core developers won't like that > idea very much because it's probably a lot more operation overhead... This might not be a bad idea. In the past, the Fedora Board (under whatever name) was also the Core board. Now that Fedora is much larger, it does make sense to have a Core board that deals directly with Core, while the Fedora board deals with the project as a whole and issues escalated to it from the various subprojects. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpOdt23gDvHj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
