On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 19:38 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 19:12 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > Really there are two issues. > > Three. > > > > > 1) Are we going to use the latest upstream rpm version? > > > > 2) Are we going to continue using upstream rpm at all? > > <snip perfectly valid answer for #1> > > > #2 is a far more complicated question, one that SHOULD involve the board and > > the community, and is noted to be on the boards plate. > > Good to know. > > > How we got to this point was the goals we had in mind for this release and > > last. They were incompatible with a major change to RPM. Plain and simple. > > And that brings up 3. > > 3) Communication on such things with the community. > > The above is a perfectly valid statement as to why RPM has not been > upgraded in Core. Why couldn't someone simply add a comment to the bug > saying so? Instead, it was left completely unanswered until it turned > into the flamefest it is now. > Paul asked the board for a comment. We're still discussing it. That's about all it is. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
