On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 19:12 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > Really there are two issues. Three. > > 1) Are we going to use the latest upstream rpm version? > > 2) Are we going to continue using upstream rpm at all? <snip perfectly valid answer for #1> > #2 is a far more complicated question, one that SHOULD involve the board and > the community, and is noted to be on the boards plate. Good to know. > How we got to this point was the goals we had in mind for this release and > last. They were incompatible with a major change to RPM. Plain and simple. And that brings up 3. 3) Communication on such things with the community. The above is a perfectly valid statement as to why RPM has not been upgraded in Core. Why couldn't someone simply add a comment to the bug saying so? Instead, it was left completely unanswered until it turned into the flamefest it is now. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly