On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 03:45 +0530, Rahul wrote: > This is exactly what I suggested when the OPL relicensing of Fedora Docs > policy was being discussed earlier. We really should fix the warranty > issue with Creative Commons. We have a good relationship with them already. Well, we had enough dragons to slay at that time. Fortunately, now that everyone has to sign the CLA, we can add such a fixed CC license easily. :) - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
