Karsten Wade wrote:
We're a little jammed, though, in that there is not a good enough art license. The OPL is book specific, although perhaps if we put the reference paragraph in the image metadata itself? I'm glad we don't maintain our own OSI-compliant license, like everyone else does when they get in this jam. Can we work with Creative Commons to get the warranty provision resolved, or have them create a new license, CC-BY-SA-NW (no warranty)? - Karsten
This is exactly what I suggested when the OPL relicensing of Fedora Docs policy was being discussed earlier. We really should fix the warranty issue with Creative Commons. We have a good relationship with them already.
Rahul _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
