On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 13:23 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > This really does sound like a fork situation. An abandonment may not be in > our best favor right now, but a fork to further develop how we see fit and > repair how we see fit w/out having to fight with unsavory upstream developers > may be the best technical solution. The perils of a soft fork...we're too far down the road now for that. There have been forks in the past that we re-merged down the road to the benefit of all. This might be one such case. Or it might be a case where we fork for good, for the benefit of all. But we clearly cannot remain engaged with the community if we're not transparent about our concerns or our plans of action to address those concerns, and they are telling us as much. M _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
