Re: [fab] Governing body to handle package guideline issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:20 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:10 -0400, Max Spevack wrote:
> > Personally, I don't think this group needs to be some sort of elected 
> > body.  I think we should be able to pretty easily determine who the right 
> > people are, and from that group elect/appoint a leader.  Then we just need 
> > to make it very clear what the mandate of this group is, give it a wiki 
> > page and an email list, and let it go.
> 
> I agree.

For what its worth, I've been doing this since day one, and I would very
much like to continue to be involved with Fedora Packaging. However, I
agree that this work needs to be decided upon by a group of people, as
opposed to just me (I scale poorly).

Heck, we already have our own mailing list, we just never use it. :)

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux