On Mon, 15 May 2006, Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx wrote:
What percentage of R&D spending and maintenance spending goes into FC ? What's the outlook for the next couple years ?
That's a good point -- I'd expand it to "how do you see Fedora's role within Red Hat evolving over the next few years, from an R&D perspective and also a resource perspective?"
What kind of commitment to FE infrastructure can we get, in terms of - bandwidth - Fedora project hosting - build systems - mailing lists archiving and searching - whole repo archiving and distribution ?
I don't think we need to bring this specifically to Matthew. I see this along the lines of -- the Board continues to make sure Fedora has the resources that it needs. If we don't have those resources, it's up to me to make the case to get them, and then we do. We should implement the things that we thing are worthwhile, and when we run out of space to put it, then we point to it and say "look at all this good stuff we've done, give us more resources" and we get them.
Any inclination on the split Core / Extras ?
Matthew has heard to pitch regarding bridging the gap between Core and Extras, and he is supportive of the direction that the Board and the community want to take. Still, it wouldn't surprise me if this topic came up to some extent in our call.
Any new architectures planed (Itanium, SPARC, ...) for FC ?
That's up to fedora-devel and the community. We can expand to whatever architectures we are able and willing to support.
-- Max Spevack + http://people.redhat.com/mspevack/ + gpg key -- http://people.redhat.com/mspevack/mspevack.asc + fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21
