On Thursday 04 May 2006 16:57, "Stephen John Smoogen" <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 5/4/06, Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I think we should hold on to these names for the foreseeable future. We > > want to guard against potentially hostile squatters, and also it would > > be painful a few years from now if we change our mind and want to do a > > Foundation. This is a tiny price to pay for insurance against these > > issues. > > If we do keep them, they should point to something useful, like a > webpage with the current explanation of why the fedorafoundation was > not done and how the current fedora group is structured. > I agree that we should hold onto them, at least for this year. If we're going to point them at a particular resource, it should probably be our existing page of information about the Foundation: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Foundation > > fedora.org expires on May 28th, 2006. Attempt to grab that? =) > > And put the various special interest groups's page on that? > ...or just point it straight at fedoraproject.org. :-) -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://www.n-man.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64 Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ --
Attachment:
pgpdD4Xjr5es3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
