On 4/17/06, Max Spevack <mspevack@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've got 31 folks on this list right now. They're all folks who were > either on the old advisors list, or who contacted me specifically and > "made sense" to add. > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/roster/fedora-advisory-board > > How do we want to handle subscriptions in general? Should we just let > anyone on? Do we want to keep the subscribed members to folks who have > "proven" their contributions to Fedora? How do we decide? How do we keep > the signal/noise level on this list at a good place? Are there criteria > under which people can be removed? Allow me to be the first to start the conversation. :) Personally, I believe this list should run similar to fedora-ambassadors-list. We have several moderators who all monitor the subscriptions and approve based on their minimum requirements. Obviously those requirements should be different than Fedora Ambassadors Program since this is a place where *the leaders of leaders* discuss the future direction of Fedora Project. So yes, I believe this list should be subscribed by people who "proved" their contributions to Fedora. As far as criteria goes, I believe it should be drafted by the board and fine tuned by the advisory board. Regards, -- Thomas Chung http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung
