On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:02:14AM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 09:37 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > Hi Rich, > > > > On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 12:47 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:43:42PM -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote: > > > > fedora-virt@xxxxxxxxxx -- the new list > > > [...] > > > > et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx -- virt-manager, virt-install, virsh, and > > > > related tools, also appliance build tools (thincrust) that target virt > > > > > > I think we should fold et-mgmt-tools into fedora-virt too. The list > > > has < 10 messages / day, and has a confusing name that superficially > > > has nothing to do with virtualization unless you happen to know the > > > history behind some Red Hat internal department. > > > > Agree that the "et-mgmt-tools" name sucks, but virt-manager and > > virt-install should continue to have an upstream project list. > > ... and virt-p2v, virt-mem, virt-top etc., sorry. > > What is the complete list of projects that use this as their upstream > list these days? What would be a better name for that group? Certainly, > none of them are Fedora specific. I think of them as 'virt-tools' which would have been a better name for this list Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
