On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 09:37 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Hi Rich, > > On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 12:47 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:43:42PM -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote: > > > fedora-virt@xxxxxxxxxx -- the new list > > [...] > > > et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx -- virt-manager, virt-install, virsh, and > > > related tools, also appliance build tools (thincrust) that target virt > > > > I think we should fold et-mgmt-tools into fedora-virt too. The list > > has < 10 messages / day, and has a confusing name that superficially > > has nothing to do with virtualization unless you happen to know the > > history behind some Red Hat internal department. > > Agree that the "et-mgmt-tools" name sucks, but virt-manager and > virt-install should continue to have an upstream project list. ... and virt-p2v, virt-mem, virt-top etc., sorry. What is the complete list of projects that use this as their upstream list these days? What would be a better name for that group? Certainly, none of them are Fedora specific. Cheers, Mark. _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
