-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stephen John Smoogen wrote: | On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:58 AM, John Eckersberg <jeckersb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: |> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |> Hash: SHA1 |> |> Working well but probably needs a bit more cleanup... |> | | Well a 0 length patch usually works well. What are you wanting to | patch it against? | | |> Patches to my patch are welcome :) |> |> - -- |> John Eckersberg |> Production Operations |> Red Hat, Inc. |> |> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) |> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |> |> iD8DBQFIFeYdO5VSO/Qqm+gRAsnuAJ4t98cCcrMgXKiKOhGkAPFSwQtehgCgwita |> QpgcxdSFj6qlRaGwkVymD4w= |> =bKNt |> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |> |> _______________________________________________ |> et-mgmt-tools mailing list |> et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx |> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools |> | | | Ah I think this is mailman eating my patch. Here you go: http://jeckersb.fedorapeople.org/cobbler/0001-Initial-attempt-at-supporting-BIND-DNS-management.patch /me makes note to look into upgrading mailman :) - -- John Eckersberg Production Operations Red Hat, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIFhKZO5VSO/Qqm+gRAn23AJkBeq3xMmg0apMN7+bXolb/Rj6S6ACdHhz/ yI2vCpXj3LZf3d14LXkoQT4= =OCLA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
