Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:58 AM, John Eckersberg <jeckersb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Working well but probably needs a bit more cleanup...
Well a 0 length patch usually works well. What are you wanting to
patch it against?
You have run afoul of our mailman install it seems.
This usually does not happen with attachments, though if you'd like to
try sending the patch as text that would probably be a good idea. For
simplicity in patching, emailing my address with the attachment is great
too -- though I'm sure the list would like to see the patch.
--Michael
Patches to my patch are welcome :)
- --
John Eckersberg
Production Operations
Red Hat, Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIFeYdO5VSO/Qqm+gRAsnuAJ4t98cCcrMgXKiKOhGkAPFSwQtehgCgwita
QpgcxdSFj6qlRaGwkVymD4w=
=bKNt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
