Michael El mar, 22-04-2008 a las 19:36 -0400, Michael DeHaan escribió: > ";" is (to my eyes) valid in XML. It is, right? Any idea why that may > cause an error on Pablo's system? > > Pablo, we did confirm the version with just ";" and not "&" as the > seperator did break things, correct? Failed with both ";" and "&" using koan and virsh ;) > It would be nice if I could make that also work for 5.1 installs that > were out there as it reduces one extra point of user confusion about where > errors come from... +1 Pablo -- Pablo Iranzo Gómez (Pablo.Iranzo@xxxxxxxxxx) RHCE/Global Profesional Services Consultant Spain Phone: +34 645 01 01 49 (CET/CEST) GnuPG KeyID: 0xFAD3CF0D --- Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain Dirección Registrada: Red Hat S.L., C/ Velazquez 63, Madrid 28001, Spain Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
