Re: Looping through possibilities in a "snippet"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sandor W. Sklar wrote:

On Apr 7, 2008, at 8:42 AM, Michael DeHaan wrote:
Sandor W. Sklar wrote:


I would probably solve the problem of sourcing the packages list from an external file in a different way...

Hi, Michael,

Thanks; I hadn't thought of doing it that way. I'd prefer that the cobbler-rendered kickstarts were "complete", but it seems that this is a good workaround that accomplishes what I'm trying to do.

I'll file an RFE on exploring it this way.


Knowing very little of python (guess I'm going to have to crack a book some day), can I assume that doing what I originally hoped for would be too awkward? ( I use that word instead of "not possible", because the Perl that I know has let me to understand that nothing is impossible! :-)

Kinda, in general a template that tries to test for existance of a file on the filesystem starts being more "code" than template. That can get scary, as you've seen. Cheetah does allow blurring that line, but I like keeping the template files as "data" for basic string substitution and not pushing it that far.

This isn't to say we can't achieve a similar solution in Cobbler itself, that may be more elegant than either option. I'll open up a RFE on this to see what the options are -- things that allow someone to edit kickstarts /less/ would be good, and I can see something like this even being presented in the UI.

We could have cobbler automatically include content from /var/lib/cobbler/packages_list/profiles/$name and /var/lib/cobbler/packages_list/systems/$name every time we sync if we wanted to. We do have the question then of what gets appended to a list or what gets used /instead/, and which use case is more important. I can kind of see cases for both.

Ideally one wouldn't be assigning specific packages to specific systems, as the point of a profile is to make a configuration available to all things that look "like" something. Can you explain your use case for assigning specific packages to specific systems?

Thoughts on how that should work?

I do like this idea a lot...

--Michael


_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux