Aaron Lippold wrote:
Hi,
Well yes, but I was just letting you know that the el5 rpms weren't in
the EPEL repo. I thought you had said you were going to put them
there. I guess the process is that EL5 is built from the src rpms?
Thanks,
Aaron
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Michael DeHaan <mdehaan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Aaron Lippold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't seem to find these cobbler 0.7.2 in the testing EPEL repo.
> Have they been uploaded?
> Jucain is a Cobbler newbie and is setting a cobbler server up on a
> Dell Xeon 1U box to help with some provisioning. If someone could send
> us the current links, I would appreciate it.
>
No problem. The email mentioned
http://cobbler.et.redhat.com/download/testing/
Though I'll be releasing updated versions of those (with fixes from
everyone's testing) to Fedora/EPEL tomorrow as 0.8/stable.
--Michael
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
EPEL is built from the tarballs, technically, though since I am not in
control of what goes to EPEL stable vs testing (as is anyone), I choose
to not push "testing" content to EPEL, so that people can use EPEL
testing to get the latest -- even if EPEL has not yet rolled testing
over to stable. Previously this happened roughly quarterly -- it's
more often now IIRC -- but there's still an interest in the ability to
supply a newer "stable" than EPEL "stable" allows.
Make sense? :)
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
