Rainer Duffner wrote:
Am 04.02.2008 um 21:27 schrieb JimmyT _:
I told you what we changed .... a new box, with a fresh download, and
a vanilla install.
Based on your reposnse, it's clear the perception is that "it's us".
Fair enough. We'll stick to supported products.
Do physical installs work?
It works here, basically out-of-the-box.
Sometimes, though, the RPC-XML interface can get "cobbled" and I've
got to restart httpd+cobblerd.
Haven't figured out why, though.
Development cobbler from git (0.7.X, 0.8 candidate) has some logging
updates that also include much better remote exception handling, so stay
tuned for that, I suspect that should go away. I haven't seen any issues
with cobblerd from the development build which I've been running in a
/long/ time. I do recall some issues with cobblerd in previous releases.
I really wish I had something like cobbler for my FreeBSD-installations.
I'm not sure I've mentioned that to you yet or not (I know I have some
other folks) --
Cobbler already has support in there to do SuSE/Debian type installs
(they take an answer file, even if it's not technically a kickstart). If
there's an easy enough way to adapt
the code (mainly action_sync.py and item_distro.py) to grok the BSD
differences, I'd be willing to take incorporate it. Honestly I'm not all
that familiar with what it takes to
network install BSDs -- patches definitely welcome though.
There's a lot I don't like about Linux - but RHELs kickstart + cobbler
works _very_ well.
And I really get better "support" from Michael et.al. via IRC/ML than
I get from other, wanna-be vendors via a paid contract.
Glad to hear that. Thanks!
cheers,
Rainer
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
