Re: re: "invalid kernel" -- found the problem!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 04.02.2008 um 21:27 schrieb JimmyT _:

I told you what we changed .... a new box, with a fresh download, and
a vanilla install.

Based on your reposnse, it's clear the perception is that "it's us".

Fair enough.  We'll stick to supported products.




Do physical installs work?
It works here, basically out-of-the-box.

Sometimes, though, the RPC-XML interface can get "cobbled" and I've got to restart httpd+cobblerd.
Haven't figured out why, though.
But I don't do any kind of Xen-installations. And I use RHEL5 as base. Fedora is too much a moving target for us.

I really wish I had something like cobbler for my FreeBSD-installations.
There's a lot I don't like about Linux - but RHELs kickstart + cobbler works _very_ well. And I really get better "support" from Michael et.al. via IRC/ML than I get from other, wanna-be vendors via a paid contract.



cheers,
Rainer
--
Rainer Duffner
CISSP, LPI, MCSE
rainer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux