Re: solaris virt-install patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dec 4, 2007 5:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Mark Johnson wrote:
> > from conversation on #xen.... current Solaris virt-install patches attached.
> >
> > Disclaimers :-)
> >   This are informational only (e.g. not proposing they be applied)..
> >   They still need cleanup etc.. These patches are what are in the
> >     current solaris builds.
> >   We are currently still working on the lastest version of virt-install.
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> It was a bit hard to read your patches because they weren't attached
> with a text MIME-type.  Renaming them as '*.txt' or '*.patch', or
> reconfiguring your MUA should fix that.

Sorry about that.. :-(


> mac-address-parse:  Looks fine
>
> use-virsh-console:  Sensible patch
>
> outgoing:
> This patch seems to be corrupt in some way.  A diff of a diff?

I was in a rush, included that file by mistake..



> solaris-support:
>
> Solaris puts the Python interpreter in /bin instead of /usr/bin.  This
> will break things on Linux so we should fix this so it can find the
> Python interpreter along the path.  No idea how to fix this with Python
> but I'm sure there's a standard way involving 'env' or something similar.

No need to. We shouldn't be changing that. It's a bug on
our end (/bin can be a sym link to /usr/bin).



> The rest of the patch looks sensible.  In general all this code needs
> rewriting to support capabilities and the storage API (once that's in
> libvirt), but for a fix now it's fine.


Thanks,

MRJ

_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux