On Dec 4, 2007 5:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Mark Johnson wrote: > > from conversation on #xen.... current Solaris virt-install patches attached. > > > > Disclaimers :-) > > This are informational only (e.g. not proposing they be applied).. > > They still need cleanup etc.. These patches are what are in the > > current solaris builds. > > We are currently still working on the lastest version of virt-install. > > Hi Mark, > > It was a bit hard to read your patches because they weren't attached > with a text MIME-type. Renaming them as '*.txt' or '*.patch', or > reconfiguring your MUA should fix that. Sorry about that.. :-( > mac-address-parse: Looks fine > > use-virsh-console: Sensible patch > > outgoing: > This patch seems to be corrupt in some way. A diff of a diff? I was in a rush, included that file by mistake.. > solaris-support: > > Solaris puts the Python interpreter in /bin instead of /usr/bin. This > will break things on Linux so we should fix this so it can find the > Python interpreter along the path. No idea how to fix this with Python > but I'm sure there's a standard way involving 'env' or something similar. No need to. We shouldn't be changing that. It's a bug on our end (/bin can be a sym link to /usr/bin). > The rest of the patch looks sensible. In general all this code needs > rewriting to support capabilities and the storage API (once that's in > libvirt), but for a fix now it's fine. Thanks, MRJ _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools