Re: [et-mgmt-tools] Cimbiote methods

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/22/07, Michael DeHaan <mdehaan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wow, a post about Cimbiote :)   I'm happy and sad at the same time.
You're basically the first person who has asked about it.    Cimbiote is
now largely unmaintained, and I should update the web page to indicate
we are looking for a new owner.    I would really like to see someone
who is well connected with CIM development help continue it.

I would like to take ownership of Cimbiote if you're looking for a new
owner.  I added support for associations to Cimbiote a couple of months
back, but haven't got around to testing it thoroughly yet, which is why
I haven't submitted the patch yet.

At the time when it was written we saw a lot of large company interest
in CIM and wanted to help out in making writing providers easier for
those that were not CIM experts -- writing CIM providers is way too
painful, and documentation is scarce.     Standardized interfaces, we
thought, were definitely a good idea, but the problem was these
standards were overcomplicated and that created a high barrier to entry
for open-source players (who generally preferred simpler and more
transparent technology).  Unfortunately, we were unable to drum up
community interest among pegasus-list and open source CIM project
leaders.  

I did a presentation on pywbem and Cimbiote at Management Developers
Conference ( mandevcon.com) back in December.  I believe the current
CIM/WBEM community isn't very interested in a Python provider
interface because to date, most of this group has been involved in
embedded environments such as BMCs, where python is not guaranteed
to be present. 


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux