On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:04:12AM +0000, Richard Jones wrote: > On 20 Feb 2007, at 10:39, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > - I think I'd only use the "Connect to" concept with remote > > management - connecting to a remote machine is a well understood > > concept, but connecting to a hypervisor is a little weird. Perhaps > > "Manage Xen guests" vs. Manage QEMU guests" as above > > What's the general plan for being able to manage both through the > same virt-manager interface? [1] I'd like to de-emphasise the idea of connecting to hypervisors in faavour of connecting to hosts - and automatically pick either Xen or QEMU as a default connection for localhost.As mentioned in the previous mail, the flat tree view would instead be a 2 level tree, showing hosts, and the VMs running on them. Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
