Hi Susi, Susi Lehtola <jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > > it appears rpm has now deprecated the old %patch syntax in rawhide, which means > that any old-style expressions > > %patch0 -p1 -b .overflow > > must now be written as > > %patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow > > Unfortunately, all the epel branches, in turn, do not support the new %patch > syntax. This means that one either > - cannot use the same spec file to build in epel or > - must introduce conditionals and duplicate code in the spec files > > %if 0%{?epel} < 10 > %patch0 -p1 -b .overflow > %else > %patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow > %endif > > Is there any hope of fixing this issue, or altenatively, a known workaround that > is compatible in both branches? The following should work on all rpm versions [1]: %patch -P1 Cheers, Dan Footnotes: [1] https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/spec.html#patch-1 -- _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue