The alternative syntax that is backward compatible is using “-P 0" instead of "0".
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024, 10:09 AM Susi Lehtola <jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
it appears rpm has now deprecated the old %patch syntax in rawhide, which means
that any old-style expressions
%patch0 -p1 -b .overflow
must now be written as
%patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow
Unfortunately, all the epel branches, in turn, do not support the new %patch
syntax. This means that one either
- cannot use the same spec file to build in epel or
- must introduce conditionals and duplicate code in the spec files
%if 0%{?epel} < 10
%patch0 -p1 -b .overflow
%else
%patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow
%endif
Is there any hope of fixing this issue, or altenatively, a known workaround that
is compatible in both branches?
Susi
--
Susi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
-- _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
