[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 10 status update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 03.09.24 um 18:00 schrieb Troy Dawson:
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 3:03 PM Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gary.buhrmaster@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 10:42 PM Carl George <carl@xxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:carl@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

     >
     > Happy packaging!
     >

    I have noted that some dependencies for some
    of my packages are (apparently) no longer
    going to be shipped in EL10 (they were in
    EL9).

    Before I request the branches and builds
    in EPEL10, I would like to make sure those
    packages are really removed from EL10, and
    are not some artifact of my misunderstandings.

    Is there a list somewhere of packages that
    are known to have been removed from EL10?


Three things I do.
1 - Go to the CentOS Stream koji instance, look up the package, look at the latest el10 build of that package, and see if it's tags have been removed, or it has a trashcan tag.
Examples:
bash (still there) - https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=62779 <https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=62779> java-17-openjdk (removed) - https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=66493 <https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=66493>

2 - dnf list <package>
This isn't the best.  Sometimes a package is still in the process of being removed.  Or it's been untagged, but we haven't had a successful compose pushed out.
But, it's still a quick way to check.

3 - jira search
The CentOS Stream 10 package removals are public in jira.  We have a tag for centos-stream-10 package removals. This isn't 100% accurate, because sometimes the package has been re-added, but that is rare.
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CS-2504?jql=labels%20%3D%20rhel-10-beta-package-removal <https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CS-2504?jql=labels%20%3D%20rhel-10-beta-package-removal>



I wonder if RHEL10 will have a Workstation flavor? Or if CS10 will be usable as Workstation OS. When I see all the missing/removed parts.
Can not imagine that EPEL can compensate this all (e.g. is firefox in
the compose?).


--
Leon





--
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux