On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:31:37 +0000 Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > Is not an negative feedback, is a side note but I realize some time > ago that version with next is bigger than version without next [1] > therefore we should find a way that the el8 version be greater than > the el8.next version. > > > [1] > > rpmdev-vercmp 1.el8.next 1.el8 > > 1.el8.next > 1.el8 > I already suggested adding requirement to do a release bump when building from epel-next to epel. https://pagure.io/epel/pull-request/259 I find it important that new, compatible with new rhel build has bigger version-release than epel-next build. -- Tuomo Soini <tis@xxxxxxxxx> Foobar Linux services +358 40 5240030 Foobar Oy <https://foobar.fi/> -- _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
