On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:05:26AM +0200, Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: > Am 15.05.23 um 20:50 schrieb Jonathan Wright: > > EPEL tracks RHEL, not clones. > > > > EPEL10 is likely to resolve this, however. Ref > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-proposal > > <https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-proposal> > > > > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 1:31 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel > ... > > > > > > While setting up a new workstation with an EL rebuild, I run into the > > situation that ansible is not installable (rocky still on 9.1). Is there > > a chance from EPEL side to close this time gap by at least keep older > > packages (current-1) on the repos? Like epel-next closes the "forward" > > gap, this would close such "backward" gap, thought ... > > > > -- > > Leon > > > Well, my point was not a strategy change, more a technical variation > that eliminates a lot of cases (also the above mentioned). Without > a single downgrade path, regressions can not be addressed. Just an > example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184351 > > So, it was a general feasibility request. For those that slip into > such situation; there are still the repo archives, that get a copy > when a minor release happens (this one I had forgotten). This has been asked for many times, but our compose tooling doesn't lend itself to doing this. :( kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
