Am 10.05.23 um 05:24 schrieb Maxwell G:
Hello EPEL users and developers, RHEL 9.2 was released today, so I have updated ansible in EPEL 9 from 6.3.0 to 7.2.0 to match RHEL 9.2's ansible-core bump from 2.13.3 to 2.14.2. Each ansible major version is tied to a specific major version of ansible-core, and we keep them in sync. Along with this change, RHEL 9.2 builds ansible-core for the python3.11 stack instead of the default python3 (3.9) stack. Therefore, ansible in EPEL now built for python3.11 as well. Here is the Bodhi update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f51a0ff8a1 Please help test and give karma. Until this update is pushed to stable, you may receive an error like this when running dnf upgrade ``` Error: Problem: package ansible-6.3.0-2.el9.noarch requires python3.9dist(ansible-core) >= 2.13.3, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both ansible-core-2.14.2-4.el9.x86_64 and ansible-core-2.13.3-2.el9_1.x86_64 - cannot install both ansible-core-2.14.2-4.el9.x86_64 and ansible-core-2.13.3-1.el9.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package ansible-core-2.13.3-2.el9_1.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package ansible-6.3.0-2.el9.noarch (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) ``` There are a couple potential solutions: 1. Run $ dnf upgrade --exclude ansible-core to skip ansible-core and upgrade everything else. 2. In a couple hours from from now (now is 3:15 UTC), you'll be able to install ansible 7.2.0 from testing with $ dnf upgrade --refresh --enablerepo=epel-testing ansible ansible-core and then run a plain `dnf upgrade` as usual.
While setting up a new workstation with an EL rebuild, I run into the situation that ansible is not installable (rocky still on 9.1). Is there a change from EPEL side to close this time gap by at least keep older packages (current-1) on the repos? Like epel-next closes the "forward" gap, this would close such "backward" gap, thought ...
-- Leon _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
