On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 7:38 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 22. 04. 22 19:53, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to debug a segfault during %check that only occurs in epel9
> Koji, but not in mock.
>
> At the end, I compared the list of packages with:
>
> $ koji list-buildroot 34845388 | sort > koji
> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 shell -- rpm -qa | sort > mock
> $ diff -u koji mock | grep -v ' '
> +acl-2.3.1-3.el9.x86_64
> -audit-libs-3.0.7-101.el9.x86_64
> ...
>
> This seems like my local mock has newer c9s packages than the Koji build repo.
> Is that expected, or is pulling c9s packages into the build repo stuck on Koji
> side?
>
> Actually, I got an idea that EPEL 9 Koji might already be using (internal?)
> RHEL 9.0, possibly I have missed this switch... However, the
> centos-stream-release package contraditcs taht idea :/
>
> I've checked with an EPEL 9 Next Koji scratchbuild and it got e.g.
> pyproject-rpm-macros-1.0.1-1.el9.
Thanks for all the answers -- I see them in the archives but never received them :(
Was this "freeze" ever announced somewhere? I might have missed that as well,
considering I am clearly missing some email.
I know in the weekly council meeting it was announced.
But now that I go through my emails I see that we announced we were going to do it, but we never actually sent out an email saying that the change had happened.
Sorry about that.
Troy
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
