On 26/04/2022 13.00, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 04. 22 19:53, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to debug a segfault during %check that only occurs in
epel9 Koji, but not in mock.
At the end, I compared the list of packages with:
$ koji list-buildroot 34845388 | sort > koji
$ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 shell -- rpm -qa | sort > mock
$ diff -u koji mock | grep -v ' '
+acl-2.3.1-3.el9.x86_64
-audit-libs-3.0.7-101.el9.x86_64
...
This seems like my local mock has newer c9s packages than the Koji
build repo. Is that expected, or is pulling c9s packages into the
build repo stuck on Koji side?
Actually, I got an idea that EPEL 9 Koji might already be using
(internal?) RHEL 9.0, possibly I have missed this switch... However,
the centos-stream-release package contraditcs taht idea :/
I've checked with an EPEL 9 Next Koji scratchbuild and it got e.g.
pyproject-rpm-macros-1.0.1-1.el9.
Thanks for all the answers -- I see them in the archives but never
received them :(
Was this "freeze" ever announced somewhere? I might have missed that as
well, considering I am clearly missing some email.
The only announcement about this "freeze" I can remember was part of the
"CPE Weekly Update – Week of February 28th – March 3rd" which was at
least sent to devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and centos-devel@xxxxxxxxxx.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
