On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 5:05 PM Carl George <carl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 5:17 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 3:00 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 13:08 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:46 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 2022-03-31 at 11:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >> > > This update changes a library soname, which makes it an > >> > > incompatible > >> > > upgrade. It must follow the EPEL incompatible upgrades policy [0]. > >> > > This email can count as step 1 once you reply with the specific > >> > > CVEs > >> > > this will address. Then it must be open for discussion on list for > >> > > one week (step 2) before being added as an agenda item at next > >> > > week's > >> > > EPEL Steering Committee meeting [1] (step 3). > >> > > > >> > > [0] > >> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/ > >> > > [1] https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/epel/#m9854 > >> > > >> > OK , thank you > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> have we any new ? > >> > >> I'd like move on before rhel 8.6 be available . > >> > >> > >> Thank you > >> > >> > >> Hi Sérgio, > >> Could you list the CVE's that this update addresses. > >> If that list is fairly long, at least the important ones > >> > >> > >> > >> we got 82 reported on bugzilla > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&classification=Fedora&component=ImageMagick&list_id=12543908&product=Fedora%20EPEL&query_format=advanced > > > > > > Youch! > > Next time, lead with that. :) > > I joke, but that's really what we were waiting for. > > It's a Friday afternoon, and I'm pretty certain we won't get enough of the committee reading this to give a full vote until next week. > > But, as for me, I give it a +1. > > Troy > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > This was approved [0] in today's EPEL Steering Committee meeting. > Please continue with the process for incompatible upgrades from step 4 > forward [1]. > > [0] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/epel/epel.2022-04-13-20.00.html > [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/#process_for_incompatible_upgrades > > -- > Carl George Based on repoquery it looks like only three packages need to be rebuilt for this. converseen digikam dvdauthor -- Carl George _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
