On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:46 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2022-03-31 at 11:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > This update changes a library soname, which makes it an
> > incompatible
> > upgrade. It must follow the EPEL incompatible upgrades policy [0].
> > This email can count as step 1 once you reply with the specific
> > CVEs
> > this will address. Then it must be open for discussion on list for
> > one week (step 2) before being added as an agenda item at next
> > week's
> > EPEL Steering Committee meeting [1] (step 3).
> >
> > [0]
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/
> > [1] https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/epel/#m9854
>
> OK , thank you
Hi,
have we any new ?
I'd like move on before rhel 8.6 be available .
Thank you
Hi Sérgio,
Could you list the CVE's that this update addresses.
If that list is fairly long, at least the important ones.
Troy
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure